• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -102 years ago

      If it’s to kill terrorists that are enemies of both the US and Mexican government, not really.

      • Awoo [she/her]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        562 years ago

        Mexico isn’t fucking inviting the US to do it. They want the US to fuck off.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Still, misleading title, he’s not proposing a war. Could it potentially lead to war? Yeah but it’s very, very unlikely Mexico would actually declare war on America.

          • Awoo [she/her]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            What the fuck do you think putting your military into another country uninvited is? What the fuck are you doing quibbling over “potentially” a war or not? What you’re essentially saying here is that you’re ok with it as long if Mexico cowers and doesn’t fight back.

            This is a disgusting level of nationalism. You’re already making excuses for america.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -22 years ago

              Typical hexbears to shove words down throats.

              I never said I wasn’t against this, I’m merely saying the title should’ve been something like, “Ron DeSantis proposes uninvited drone strikes on Mexican cartel”

          • Redcat [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            40
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            The United States is not an arbiter of which Mexicans are to be extrajudicially executed by drone strikes. You’re acting like a coward who’s only too happy the Mexicans are too weak to strike back.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -22 years ago

              Buddy all I’m saying is the title is misleading. I’m obviously against the US bombing Mexican cartels, I just don’t think it’s going to start a war.

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                342 years ago

                If you think the US would be disciplined about only attacking cartels after seeing the War on Terror, I have a bridge to sell you

              • Redcat [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                28
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Yes, you know that the US can do almost anything it wants and that it won’t trigger a war with Mexico. It can sanction thousands or millions to death by starvation and lack of medical supplies. It can bomb people. It can seize and occupy territory if it really wants to. Not because the US wouldn’t be waging war then, but because the Mexicans and the rest of latin america are too weak to fight back. And in knowing this you can then claim that, actually, ‘this is misleading 4/5 pinocchios Ron DeSantis only wants the right to do a little gunboat diplomacy with capital punishment characteristics and that’s not really a war’.

                I’m sure that if China drone bombed someone in New York the Americans would be super chill about it.

          • MoreAmphibians [none/use name]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            262 years ago

            The US hasn’t declared a war since WW2, they’ve still gone to war. Neither the US nor Libya declared war on each other but it still counts as a war when the US bombs the absolute shit out of a country.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -22 years ago

              “War” implies the US and Mexico mutually fighting. Libya was military intervention not war.

              • immuredanchorite [he/him, any]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                362 years ago

                checkmate! it can’t be called a war if we simply lob misiles at a country and arm every lunatic we find, completely destroying it in the process smuglord

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -22 years ago

                  Well yeah, you OBJECTIVELY can’t call what happened in Libya a “war”. It was bad and unnecessary, but by definition, not a war… You did not have US troops fighting Libyan troops.

                  • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    292 years ago

                    So because the US troops were using weapons the Libyan troops couldn’t effectively fight back against, it doesn’t count as a war?

                    “It wasn’t a battle, it was a just a massacre, so it’s OK”

              • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                282 years ago

                Of course, I forgot when you call it something other than war then it’s not a war! That’s why we have the Korean Police Action, the Vietnam Police Action, the Police Actions in Panama and Grenada, Desert Police Action 1 & 2 in Iraq, and the Global Police Action on Terror! None of those were wars, right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        472 years ago

        So you’d be okay with the Chinese dropping a bomb on a house in your neighbourhood because some right-wing nut was gonna blow up a government building?

        He’s a terrorist, so it’s all good right?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I mean, I’m not going to shed any tears over a would-be Timothy McVeigh who probably fantasized about killing leftists like me.

          Now, if they start bombing weddings, then we’ve got a problem. And yeah, the US military did that.

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            At this point you really need to define what a “war” is because all you’re doing is dancing around without having to actually stake any claim to an argument. Instead of getting indignant at people drawing conclusions from what you DO say, make the substance of your opinion known so it can be examined and criticized openly.

            Explain what the difference is between having your military attack another country and a “congress didn’t say it’s a war but it’s really a war”.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              At this point you really need to define what a “war” is

              “a state of armed conflict between different nations or states or different groups within a nation or state”

              Key word, “between.” You can’t have a war if no one declares war.

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                You can’t have a war if no one declares war

                Are you just fucking with us now? Is this a bit?

                I’ve seen at least one other person gently remind you of the last 70 years of US history. Are you just being a troll at this point?

                I worded my question explicitly so as to make you think about this. Can you please try to?

              • eatmyass [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                172 years ago

                Two states fighting against each other for the other state’s territory or resources is not a war unless they declare war?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  Mexico wouldn’t be fighting back in this case (which is obviously bad, I’m just speaking semantically).

                  • eatmyass [he/him]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    142 years ago

                    Right, but we’re just talking in the abstract. You have a definition of war, I’m asking if there is a conventional war, one state opposing another site, trying to gain the other’s resources or territory - you don’t consider this a war unless both countries explicitly declare war on the other?

      • Flinch [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’m sure the regime who drone struck weddings, hospitals, and loves to double-tap to catch civilians coming to help victims in the aftermath can be trusted to only kill “terrorists” (don’t ask what they define as a terrorist)

      • Farman [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 years ago

        What if i say the us army are terrorists? Then sending ordinance into your country should be fine no. Since i said they are terrorists.

      • oregoncom [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -62 years ago

        Maybe you should worry more about your meth-addled midwest shithole than try to turn socal into a warzone? Jesus christ I wish we could drone strike whatever meth lab you’re posting from.