@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agoReality for thee, not for mei.imgur.comimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1676arrow-down153
arrow-up1623arrow-down1imageReality for thee, not for mei.imgur.com@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•2 years agoOh so you “isolated the stats” then. Great, share them!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoEven though it doesn’t seem like you’re gonna argue in good faith, here’s a review of a book about it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoOh God, I don’t even know where to start. How do you “argue in good faith” with someone who cites a book revire as evidence? And then you bother to look at the book reviee and it says nothing about winning at trial/after charging due to wealth?
Oh so you “isolated the stats” then.
Great, share them!
Even though it doesn’t seem like you’re gonna argue in good faith, here’s a review of a book about it.
Oh God, I don’t even know where to start. How do you “argue in good faith” with someone who cites a book revire as evidence? And then you bother to look at the book reviee and it says nothing about winning at trial/after charging due to wealth?