• @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              102 years ago

              Sometimes its about helping the right people. Sometimes that means taking direction, working together, and not simply following your own bloated ego.

              Liberals seem to get that when they’re vote canvassing, fund raising, and brigading on some social media jerk off sight.

              But as soon as they see anyone to their left with any kind of organization or even a respect for their forebearers, a switch flips in their brains and all they see or hear is “tyranny”.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              If you are not willing to oppress the capitalist class how will a revolution ever survive? How will you quash racism, homophobia, transphobia, etc. without oppression? But then again you liberals only care about these people when it benefits them🤷‍♀️

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              102 years ago

              yes because it’s not anything intelligent enough to be thoughtfully argued against. a 7 year old could see the holes in such an idea

              • WabiSabiPapi
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I oppose one more system of authority than you do, in the interest of ideological consistency, intellectual honesty.

                are you taking the position of a literal child?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  42 years ago

                  is revolution not putting the authority of the people over those in power, and bringing those people low? that’s “hierarchy”

                  • WabiSabiPapi
                    link
                    fedilink
                    3
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    that depends if you draw distinction between the people and the state (which is merely an abstraction of capital)

                    state capitalism, as defined by lenin, is not a classless society, and is indefensible as a liberatory philosophy.

                    just as liberalism abolished the monarchy only to replace it with a dictatorship of private capital, authoritarian socialism replaced monarchy with a beaurocratic ruling class and unilateral control of the means of production.

                    the neck cares not the color of the boot

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              how is a small group of people commanding a big mass better?
              at least over time there will always be power hungry asshole or just an idiot in position of power.

              no power for no one is the only concept that can really work over time. but you need self-responsible and educated people for that

              edit: and yeah, it is a utopian idea, but one I believe it is worth working for

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Then every social structure is authoritarian.

          Anarchists usually distinguish between just and unjust hierarchies, by the way, and svoid the word “authoritarian” when describing just ones. Anarchists still need to organize themselves to have leadership and delegation.