When will news media stop falling for this shit?

Oh, yes, when it stops generating clicks. I am part of the problem.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’ve seen plenty of working flying cars since the late 90’s.

    Word to the media: don’t bother us with this shit until they have a working idea on how to monitor and regulate the shit so we can all have flying cars and not just one dude’s stupid prototype. The hard thing isn’t making a car that can fly. That shit is relatively easy. The hard part is figuring out how air traffic would work if everyone was up there. It’s already a PITA and there aren’t a helluva lot of planes compared to cars.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    294 months ago

    Calling this thing a “real life flying” car is generous. This thing just looks like a mock-up at best and it didn’t appear to even have a driver/pilot during the demo.

    This thing will be bad in the air and bad on the ground.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      It looks like how I drew cars when I was 5 years old (who am I kidding, it would probably still look like that if I attempted to draw one today).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    214 months ago

    Please no flying cars. Please no. The jetsons made it look cool, but that was a cartoon made in the days before 9/11 and cell phones happened.

    Now imagine some distracted driver, watching a tiktok while driving, and oops, they did another 9/11.

    Now imagine that happens every week. Not because of terrorists, but because of idiots! WE HAVE A LOT OF IDIOTS IN THIS COUNTRY!!!

    …please no.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      Cars crash into buildings all the time. Even if you took the largest consumer car and “drove” it as fast as possible into the side of a skyscraper, you wouldn’t be able to cause anything close to another 9/11.

      That said, these are terrible for other reasons.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      Why would you assume these would be driven? This looks like a Hollywood special effect reel from the 1950s. We are close to having fully autonomous vehicles already. Any practical application of this couldn’t happen for at least another 20years. If we are still driving our own vehicles by then we are all pretty fucked already.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      In fact we have the largest strategic reserve of idiots in the world! Even our president is an idiot!

  • Smuuthbrane
    link
    fedilink
    English
    184 months ago

    If that’s a “real car” then my left testicle is a genuine mild Italian meatball.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    America can’t have 4-wheeled road-legal flying cars. 4-wheeled road legal cars must have airbags, but airbags are forbidden in aircraft.

    EDIT: I stand corrected.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      Airbags are not forbidden in aircraft. They just haven’t been considered to offer enough safety benfit for their weight and cost in most cases. That is starting to change though, and airbags integrated into aircraft seatbelts are becoming more common. They can be found in first class in a number of commercial aircraft, and are sold to be retrofitted into private planes.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airplane_airbags

      https://www.amsafe.com/product/airbag-restraint-systems/

      There are many reasons I doubt this car will make it into commercial production, but the airbags will be OK.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        TIL. I was regurgitating what I saw in a video a while back about the Switchblade, which was supposedly 3 wheeled because of the airbag thing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124 months ago

    The last thing we need is flying cars, even if they do get a proper pilot’s license. You don’t exactly get air brakes while in the air, and at least in the USA, recently Elmo Turnip decided to cut flight safety…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      All the more reason for flying cars in the US:

      • No flight safety

      • So expensive only the rich can afford them

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    104 months ago

    It’s a lightweight 3d printed exoskeleton of a car using drone like motors and fans. The journalist who went in person was not allowed to be close or watch someone get in or out of the vehicle. While in air it is pretty obvious there is no interior seating just what looks like 2 large fans on the bottom. To call this even a concept of a flying car is incorrect at best it’s a custom drone.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 months ago

    the safety of the actual car is good enough for consumers

    This is a revealing statement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    74 months ago

    I saw the article before somewhere on my newsfeed and didn’t click on it. Until we get some kind of new type of technology, flying cars will always be planes or drone that kinda looks like a car.

  • Curious Canid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24 months ago

    I’ve seen kites that looked more convincing. There are now some real, functional flying cars, although they are still far too expensive to be practical. This is not one of them.

  • ekZepp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14 months ago

    Then, how about posing just a screeshot in a shitpost group or similar?