• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2471 month ago

    This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        Article is about selling nuclear powered subs. Canada doesn’t need these boondoggles for defense against US, because the mission capability is being months at sea.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 month ago

      Regardless, it’s presence makes a statement that Canada is not alone.

      Though I’d be cool if it was stationed at Miquelon for a few months.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 month ago

          Morrison knew what he was doing, the sub deal was to poison the chalice before Labor gained the majority.

          Unfortunately for the walking sack of salmonella and shitty curry, his wrangler (Murdoch) managed to sway the election enough to get the LNP back in power.

          I have actually met Morrison in person once (friends of friends of friends) and he is a fucking moron but JFC he’s at least a brain cell or two ahead of Dutton

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 month ago

            I dunno … Dutton seems smarter, but more evil. Morrison just seems like a brainwashed idiot who’s failed upwards. I don’t know how anyone looks at the screaming void of evil that is Dutton and thinks “yeah that thing has my best interests at heart … or a heart”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              101 month ago

              They’re just two different flavours of evil, Morrison is a happy clapper pentecostalist “God favours the rich” evil and Dutton is an ex-corrupt cop who wants authoritarianism under his rule evil.

              They both don’t have the critical thinking to realise the damage they do or why men like them shouldn’t hold positions of power, but Dutton following right out of Trumps playbook despite international backlash is a pretty good case for dumb-as-fuck syndrome.

              But I agree, it’s absurd that we have these stooges running for parliament I don’t know how we got here…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            I’m still not entirely sure how Australia seemingly wound up with a modified Westminster system that was worse than the original, genuinely pretty impressive.

              • Zagorath
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 month ago

                at least we have proportional representation

                Only in the Senate. And only on a per-state basis, so it’s only as proportional as “a proportion of 6” can be…which is much less proportional than a proportion of 40, like if the Senate were done nationally.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              61 month ago

              The only reason it’s worse is because we have a strong Murdoch media bias, so the general public are pretty ill-informed. With everyone being fed bullshit so often it’s easy to get them to vote against their best interests.

        • Hanrahan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 month ago

          We knew that BEFORE the election and yet elected the LNP anyway, fuck voters.

      • Pup Biru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 month ago

        right?! gawwwwwwd we’re so fucking captured

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      231 month ago

      They don’t need attack subs. They need boomer subs. At this point, Canada needs a nuclear deterrent. And I say that as an American who would be in the cross hairs of said nuclear deterrent. Canada should contract with the French for protection under their umbrella until they can build some of their own. The lesson of Ukraine should be that nukes protect small nations from fascist larger ones. Canada could easily end up like Ukraine. It’s not like fascists can’t find a casus belli. Putin was “restoring Russian glory” or some such. Trump would be “finishing the American Revolution” or some other bullshit.

      Please, Canada, from a friend of yours to the south, do not take this threat lightly. No one is going to be able to save you if the US decides to invade. The same oceans that protect you will prevent your rescue. The only hope Canada will ever have of being able to militarily protect its borders from the US is a credible nuclear deterrent.

      Just please, don’t harden your hearts while you build these weapons of destruction. Don’t close your doors to refugees from the US. As someone who is on the regime’s enemies list, hopping across the Canadian border and begging for asylum is the last chance I might have if things really go bad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -41 month ago

        Instead of putting all eggs in France basket, Canada should also approach North Korea, China, and Russia for detente and nuclear deterrence. Flirting with North Korea is best path to get SK and Japan to commit to our auto industry, and decouple from their own US extortion. Taking bids for Russia to take over NORAD sites is more constructive than continuing military cooperation, and shamefully subservient to US defense pacts with Philippines. If Russia is no longer the enemy the US forces us to make, then we are protecting the US from Russia, and they need to pay for that privilege.

        US and foreign auto industry must be forced to choose Canada over US. US manufacturing destroyed through export tariffs on materials and energy, and proceeds used to subsidize Canadian manufacturing. Manufacturing/MSFT in Washington and Michigan states must recommend secession and joining Canada, and be covered by our nuclear shields.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yes, this old news is about a nuclear-powered attack submarine, not necessarily a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        IIRC only 2 out of the 9 french subs in service exclusively carry torpedoes and anti-ship missiles (Rubis class). I’m sure the 3 Suffren class with no second strike capabilities could still deliver some sort of short ranged tac nuke. So there are high chances that this is a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      I mean, they’re not mutually exclusive. Nobody was about to start openly threatening the Americans, but having French forces around and mulling over defence deals with France sends a signal.

      We don’t know what Macron and Trudeau talked about, but accelerating things like this in light of the new reality could well have been part of it.

    • Rentlar
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      Lamp Oil, Rope, Nuclear Subs? You want it? It’s yours, my friend. As looong as you have enough Euros.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1511 month ago

    France manages to get a sub to us before the UK even deigns to comment. That says it all. Merci beacoup!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Look here sonny Jim, Daddy’s always watching, Mummy might show up first for a bit of comfort and that, but Daddy’ll be here when you need him.

    • JM⭐
      link
      fedilink
      -571 month ago

      Well done on falling for the propaganda

      • aizakku
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 month ago

        Propaganda to do better for our country is needed at this point. Trade wars are a’comin, best to have a large movement to weather the storm.

        And unfortunately might only be a few winners, https://youtu.be/oYUI4hu950w

        • JM⭐
          link
          fedilink
          -41 month ago

          You are an idiot. The sub was scheduled for a visit,months in the making. There was no show of ‘force’. Maybe take your feet out of your mouth.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          I’ll take both reasons as cannon, thank you very much

          FTFY

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 month ago

        Naval Group, a French naval defense company

        Ah shit, that’s the same company Australia had a deal with to buy diesel subs, before our fuckwit former PM reneged on the deal to create AUKUS and buy American nuclear subs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 month ago

        Weird that they specify “conventionally powered” in the Canadian article since this is a nuclear powered sub.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          I’m pretty sure that’s a Suffren class, and there’s both diesel and nuclear powered versions. Dunno how I’d tell from the outside, and don’t think the caption is necessarily all that trustworthy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            Ah, that makes sense. It’s like when the car dealer shows you the version of the car you want with slightly different features since the one you want isn’t on the lot yet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          I don’t know if that’s a mistake. It might not be a nuclear sub, just a sub which has nuclear weapons capabilities ( though obviously not this particular sub because it’s still in the hands of a defence contractor ( I hope ) ).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          I think it’s because many nations with subs have nuclear-powered vs diesel-powered. Diesel doesn’t have the vast capabilities to stay underwater for months like nuclear does.

      • Camelbeard
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Hijacking your commet to add this

        I don’t know much about this stuff, but I have been listening to a ton of podcasts about the war, geopoliticks etc.

        From what I learned, France and the UK have nukes, but not the type you can launch from a submarine. (Unfortunately)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        I had real good tingle feels imagining France showing up on our coast during this part of history.
        A real “we got you bro” moment in my imagination.

        Le sad.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1041 month ago

    JT was just in France as one of his last acts as PM. Mere days later this bad boy shows up in a Halifax harbour. 🤔🤔🤔 Merci a la belle France 🇫🇷🤝🇨🇦

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    761 month ago

    Could have imagined this happening as little as 3 years ago.

    An ally sending a nuclear deterrent into our waters as a message/warning to the US. This normally happens to countries like Iran or North Korea

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    631 month ago

    Never have I been more pleased to see a foreign navies nuclear attack sub in my nations waters.

    (odd times)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      Same. Also once you know and understand France’s history and military…. You just don’t fuck with them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    The scale of these things is always fascinating. They’re always much larger than I think they are.

    For reference, I think that’s a Suffren class, making it just shy of 100m, or a tad longer than a football field for my fellow Americans.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      The previously-mentioned French article says it’s a Barracuda, but I don’t know if that’s a model or a class.

      And unsurprisingly, he also decided to offer the Royal Canadian Navy its “premium” model, the Barracuda, rather than the Scorpène.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        The Barracuda is (apparently) an export variant of the Suffren and is indeed a little shorter but still over 300 ft long.

      • Troy
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        CFL fields are 110 yards, which is about 100m. Close enough I guess :)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    261 month ago

    Current timeline feels like one alternative Red Alert timeline, where alongside of Hitler, Stalin also got erased from history, and now Russia and the US have turned fascistic.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Important note: The “Nuclear” in “Nuclear attack submarine” means that it is powered by a nuclear reactor. It does not refer to its armament. An “attack” submarine means it is designed to attack ships and other submarines and these are typically not capable of carrying and launching ICBMs. Nuclear-armed deterrent submarines are called Ballistic Missile Submarines.