• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    168
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Leveraging people’s property to trash their privacy and serve them ads is really a good way to get me to avoid an entire brand for everything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2528 days ago

      I agree, but with TVs (or large displays" we’re at the point where there are no good options. Commercial displays are over engineered for the home and lag in technology Vs home TVs. So they’re not an option. Lg and Samsung are the display technology leaders, but their TVs are full of crap— so no. Monitors don’t go large enough for the living room.

      Guess I’m stuck with what I have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3228 days ago

        Monitors are still bigger than TVs our parents had in our childhood, no way I’m buying such a surveillance machine just for a bigger screen.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1628 days ago

          For real: I’m using a 38" ultra wide, and if you had told child me that a 38" monitor would be the smallest display in the house I’d have told you that you’re full of shit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1128 days ago

            Damn you for making me feel old by realizing my computer monitor is bigger than my childhood CRT TV.

        • Leon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          428 days ago

          Really. A bigger screen just gives my dog a bigger target when he flails his toys around.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        Why would you ever accept this anti consumer bullshit for a slightly better screen? It might not even take a year before the current cutting edge not “the best” anymore with how fast tech cycles. I would absolutely go out of my way to get a device I can deprive of an Internet connection and still use.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        527 days ago

        Huh, I’ve heard that commercial displays are the way to go. What do you mean when you say they are over engineered?

        • Not a replicant
          link
          fedilink
          English
          627 days ago

          They’re designed and built to run 16/7 or similar. If you have TV on 16 hours a day, a commercial display is worth considering.

          No, I’m not joking - I’ve seen folk who turn it on at sunrise, and off at bedtime.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          227 days ago

          They’re industrial boxes with a screen. Not aesthetically what I want in my living room. The displays are chosen for their longevity, not their picture quality. They’re often actively cooled with fans, so adding a noise level to their operation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            126 days ago

            Might wanna look around, there are plenty used as wallboards in offices that high def and whisper quiet

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          227 days ago

          You can get them now days up to 360hz refresh rate. Gaming projectors and projectors in general have came a long way from the faded blurry shit they were 10 to 15 plus years ago.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8028 days ago

    I recently bought an LG TV. I didn’t connect it to the Internet, I just use it with my Chromecast or Switch. Works great, no ads, no AI BS.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6128 days ago

      Coming soon (if not already): TVs with utility cellular connections or corpo network (like Amazon sidewalk) access that your neighbor may have not opted out of.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1128 days ago

        I mean, a camera is an easy thing to block, as long as you’re aware of it, understand the implications, and have the desire to block it. Just obstruct the lens. Roll of black electrical tape, put a strip over it, done. Now, most people out there may not actually do so…

        Only becomes an issue if other services that you actually want are tied to the camera, or if the TV refuses to operate without a usable picture of the viewer or something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        728 days ago

        Luckily my neighbors are way out of WiFi range and there is barely enough cell service here to send a text from inside the house.

        • 👍Maximum Derek👍
          link
          fedilink
          English
          328 days ago

          How close are you to a starlink constellations orbital path, now that they can be connected to via cellular modems?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            528 days ago

            That doesn’t support data yet. Data will probably cost a fortune when they enable it. I doubt anyone will be willing to pay that much to serve ads. If they do, then the antenna will be replaced with a dummy load.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        a quick reminder that the 5G standard defined a peer to pear peer operating mode for smart devices

      • Buelldozer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        228 days ago

        Some TVs already have the ability to connect to sidewalk. More worrying is that every newer “Smart” TV has the ability to cast to it so if anyone ever does that using an internet connected device like a SmartPhone then bam…your TV just got an internet connection and can now send out stored data and potentially grab a firmware update.

        Surprise!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      928 days ago

      This is the way to do it

      I blocked my lg from the Wi-Fi after i got a “Kobe Bryant memorial” ad, while playing on my switch… TF?!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 days ago

          Okay so fuck rich people destroying the planet with private air travel—however, he was still statistically more likely to die from driving that day. And so was his daughter and the other innocent kids on that flight

    • aubertlone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      027 days ago

      I’ve heard this line many times from so many people.

      So basically just Nintendo and google profit off your personal information? And doesn’t Chromecast serve ads? In the background, but still?

      I fully support your decision to not connect your LG TV to the internet. I do the same thing but it’s often just for convenience. I get better performance from my devices rather than from the TV itself for whatever application.

      Just was thinking about that recently is all.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7828 days ago

    If they ever make this a standard feature in all TVs and make it where I can’t just disconnect it from the internet, I will be using old TVs for the rest of my life.

    My TV is there to display a visual output. It does not and should not do anything else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3828 days ago

      Luckily digital signboards will always be an option to replace TVs with if the situation becomes truly dire. The sorts of no-frills displays corporations buy to display whatever media they want in store.

      Might not come with sound, but you can pick up a cheap sound bar and it will still be better than whatever cheap speakers commercial TVs try to cram in there.

      • chaosCruiser
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        728 days ago

        As long as my 1080p plasma tv works, there’s no need to upgrade. Going 4K would also mean I would have to upgrade my HTPC hardware, because that old APU probably can’t handle resolutions like that.

        In the meantime though, I’ll just keep on watching online videos in my living room without ads or interruptions. It’s been great even though all of this hardware is cheap and ancient.

        • ddh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          628 days ago

          But that’s the thing: televisions are complex and can be very difficult to repair, so what do you do when you can’t buy a dumb replacement anymore? I have the same issue with cars. I would like to replace ours with an EV, but they are a privacy nightmare whereas my car’s peak technology is FM radio.

          I was thinking earlier today about how much technology waste there is because old stuff is superseded so quickly. Maybe in future we will treasure the tech we had before it all went to shit.

          • chaosCruiser
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            28 days ago

            Kit cars have been around for ages, and Framework offers DIY laptops. I think we should have kit displays as well. Surely, someone has already made something like that with a raspberry or something.

            • ddh
              link
              fedilink
              English
              328 days ago

              Yeah, hopefully we can just buy cheap panels and put it together how we want. If that also opened up options for hackers to build entirely new display applications, or in new ways, that would be the dream.

    • TheRealKuni
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2528 days ago

      I have an LG TV. Absolutely love it.

      However, it’s not connected to the internet so it doesn’t do any of this shit. It’s just a really nice dumb TV that has the potential to spy on me if I ever gave it a chance to be smart, and I still get to take advantage of the various picture improvements that come from having the processing power of a smart TV.

      Just need something else to do streaming if that’s what you want. Like an Apple TV, nVidia Shield, Roku, or game console. Some of those will also advertise to you, but I’ve had good experience with my Apple TV.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        I wouldnt be surprised if it randomly connects to unsecured/public wifi networks to still send the spy data if it can find any in its area.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          628 days ago

          Always asume the worst with any (tech) product and any major company, and a lot of times you will be proven right later.

        • TheRealKuni
          link
          fedilink
          English
          528 days ago

          Maybe. If they’re following the rules they need you to agree to their privacy policies, and to do that you have to connect to the internet. I know from the time I did have it connected (before they rolled all this shit out) that they would let you use the TV without those policies accepted. They would just bother you about it constantly. Since I factory reset and didn’t let it connect, it hasn’t asked.

          But that’s assuming they follow the rules. I’m not knowledgeable enough to find out if they’re doing this or not.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          127 days ago

          It does have Bluetooth on and you can’t turn it off . But the wifi setting can be turned off

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5528 days ago

    Continue to never buy LG products again?

    Gotcha. The advertising works, i guess…maybe not how they wanted to, though lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1128 days ago

      Oh, they do have products without all that shit. They offer large screen monitors that are basically their TVs without the “smart” part.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        328 days ago

        i wager it has all the TV stuff gutted out, including the tuner… Which admittedly is only a problem if you use OTA and not cable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      728 days ago

      My next TV will be either a business/signage monitor or a computer monitor.
      At least something without any connection outside. No network, no anything.
      At most something like a Chromecast or similar.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1728 days ago

        “I dont want it to have anything, except google, the biggest invader of privacy there is” :p

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          528 days ago

          You can still set up your own HTPC in your living room and configure it yourself.
          And there are more solutions like from Apple (but they absolutely fucking track you as well) or other streaming box/stick solutions I am not aware of.
          Unsure how good an Nvidia Shield is in regards to privacy. Your best bet for privacy is probably to just build your own solution on Linux.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            327 days ago

            Nvidia is huge on producing AI and is certainly data-hungry. Without actually knowing, I would bet it’s about as bad as anything else. Since all your data is passing directly through their servers it’s trivial for them to do whatever they want with it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4628 days ago

    I’m about to live in a camper full of paper books. I hate everything tech has done in the last twenty years.

    • Basic Glitch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1328 days ago

      I would make an inappropriate Ted Kaczynski joke if I didn’t know everything we do is being constantly monitored at all times by a bunch of turds with zero sense of humor.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      328 days ago

      Counterpoint, we have the Cosmic Desktop (or at least an alpha for it) and tbh its pretty cool :3

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4028 days ago

    Can we please ban electronic advertising already? And billboards? Society would be better off without them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      528 days ago

      Buying a TV should be a one time cost. These companies trying to create a continuing income where none exists is just rampant greed. Don’t want to pay the cost of updating and distributing your software? The open source it and get back to making better TVs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      328 days ago

      If we ban people from “earning” over a certain amount, they’ll get round it through “gifts” or exchange in-kind or something, right? Same with ads. If we ban them, then product placement with plausible deniability will be rife, paid through essentially money-laundering methods, worse than it is now.

  • 74 183.84
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3928 days ago

    Holy shit there were so many ads in that article that I just stopped reading. It sucks LG is going down this route. They make really nice displays but now I dont ever want to buy an LG tv if its spying on me to serve me these ‘better’ ads. Fuck advertising. Its turned into a complete monster

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      428 days ago

      It’s just the addition of “AI”. We’ve been doing the same thing for a long time. I used to work for an advertising data company over a decade ago, and they filtered all the ads for one of the big channels’ streaming services in exactly the same way just with regular algorithms rather than AI. It’s what would make ads for men’s razors appear in the middle of a soap opera at 11PM because it knew the user was a man getting home from the pub.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      428 days ago

      You can’t hardly even buy computer monitors without them anymore either. Every one of the higher end Samsung or LG monitors is starting to include “smart” bullshit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          128 days ago

          it’s not talking about tracking emotions from looking at the viewer, it’s tracking the emotions in the script of the thing they’re watching, so it knows what they like.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      328 days ago

      Sounds like you need an ad blocker. I didn’t see any ads on the article except text links that were relevant to the story, which arguably aren’t ads.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3428 days ago

    Enshittification in progress. Sadly their OLED TVs are amazing, if not for the intrusive ads. It is really crap what all those companies are doing shoving ads our throats.

    I am trying to block everything using ad blockers, DNS filtering, Pi hole, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2728 days ago

      I just… don’t connect the TV to the internet. Never had an issue with anything like that.

      • SwizzleStick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        828 days ago

        This is the best way, really. Generally, you have much more control over what you plug into it.

        A display shouldn’t have anything even approaching what can be called an ‘OS’ on it. Yet here we are.

    • SwizzleStick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1328 days ago

      Sometimes even that’s not enough. I’ve had some questionable kit before that would just ignore the DNS settings fed to it if it thought they were no good, and fall back to something else preconfigured.

      pfSense is a wonderful tool for situations like that. Anything intended for local use only here just doesn’t get outside at all. Handy for stuff like a fire stick that only needs to be calling up a local media library.

      It can also mangle any DNS requests going out to a different server and redirect them to itself instead. You could do this without it with iptables/nftables on a generic Linux box, but pfSense makes it much friendlier.

      There are other packages that can do the same, but physically all you need is one piece of hardware as a bouncer that manages connections between inside/outside.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        what can it do if the TV uses DoH, DoT, or something else similar? I expect that it can do nothing. unless the TV is on a separate vlan with very strictly only access to internal services

        • SwizzleStick
          link
          fedilink
          English
          528 days ago

          At that point I would expect control of it, or at least for it to respect the configuration it is given. If neither are true, then it just doesn’t go online at all. If that’s part of the main function, then I find an alternative or live without it.

          Nothing on the inside should be sending anything to the outside that can’t be inspected before it leaves, with the exception of stuff that is directly driven by a human (guests browsing, etc).

    • Darren
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1228 days ago

      I got an LG OLED a few weeks ago. Hands down the best TV screen I’ve ever owned.

      Fuck knows what the stock OS does because I’ve only watched Apple TV through it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3027 days ago

    This tech has been in TVs easily for the past ten years.

    Did you know this stuff is in most modern cars, too? Fuck. EVERYTHING listens to you now.

    I hate to use this phrase, but, back in my day, we used to call this SPYWARE and it was treated as a virus - it was highly unacceptable by people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2928 days ago

    So we pay them to do this to us? I stopped putting tv’s on the internet once I realized it offered me nothing useful. Firmware is about it and if that’s the case I’ll either usb it or put it on the internet for 5 min to do the update. Even then Samsung sucks so much with firmware the release notes for every single update are “bug fixes and improvements”… thanks Samsung.

    If I am forced to put it online or it comes up with a way to phone home on its own, I am done buying those kinds of tv’s, and I’m sure some other brand will offer one that doesn’t, even if it isn’t the best one to buy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      728 days ago

      most firmware releases will be to fix something with the online service anyway. If it displays stuff coming down a wire from your PC when you buy it, it probably never needs an update.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        228 days ago

        I will say I had 1 time i needed it. It was my Samsung Odessey monitor. It supports freesync but I noticed when it was on there would be a slight flicker. Dealt with it for probably 2 years before looking into it. Low and behold online comments all said firmware fixed it. It worked, fixed it and now it’s been fantastic ever since. One of the only times an update on a screen did something amazing. It’s not the norm but the excception.

      • Twig
        link
        fedilink
        English
        528 days ago

        Aren’t some companies thinking of releasing TVs that won’t work unless connected to the internet?

        • Diplomjodler
          link
          fedilink
          English
          228 days ago

          I’m sure they’re thinking about it. Anyone who buys one of those deserves no better.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          228 days ago

          I have an open access point and my neighbour’s TV is on it. I’m not sure if it was deliberatel.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2828 days ago

    This is why you block the camera with a little diorama that shows a single white male viewer…frantically masturbating.

    • StinkyFingerItchyBum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2028 days ago

      Close. This is why I mastubate frantically infront of the cameras. It satifies they kink for surveilance and my kink in exhibitionism.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1328 days ago

        And an array of microphones. But it’s not like they have a clear view of their surroundings. Wait

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        325 days ago

        As if someone published a book featuring this very technology…in 1949.

        It was noted with memes when the ToS of one such television suggested not having private conversations in front of or otherwise near the TV screen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      328 days ago

      Good idea, though, this isn’t actually about cameras watching you as the title looks like.

  • AnimalsDream
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2827 days ago

    Simple solution I use: Fuck television sets, get a computer monitor and basic speakers instead. A display should do only one thing and do it well.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      427 days ago

      That would certainly be ideal, although there’s great difficulty in finding 50"+ monitors, and they cost a huge amount more

      • AnimalsDream
        link
        fedilink
        English
        227 days ago

        I guess that would beg the question, how much is it worth to you pay extra to not have additional spyware in your home? Or as others have said in this thread, there is at least one brand of television that still sells dumb tvs.