• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      And the last reason to even consider using it goes out the window 🙄 Thanks for the heads-up.

      • BarrierWithAshes
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        Not to even mention the fact a Chinese company owns Opera. Why is it even being considered?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Because it wasn’t based on the Chrome engine (initially, anyway). That’s actually a significant enough reason to at least consider it. I’ve never used Opera precisely because of its origins (honestly I thought it was Russian, though there’s not much practical difference in this case), but innovation is innovation. The fewer non-Chrome browsers exist, the worse off we all are.

          • BarrierWithAshes
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ah, didn’t know how old that doc was. Opera only switched to Chrome in 2013 or so.

            But yeah, I agree. That’s why I support Ladybird’s and Servo’s development. They are the best bet to help stop the duopoly. If only Opera would BSD-license and open source their Presto Engine I would love to see someone pick up development of that. Instead we get Opera putting jumpscares in their browser .

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              I’ve not even heard of those two, I’ve stuck with Firefox for so long. I’ll check them out, thanks!

              • BarrierWithAshes
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                They’re both pretty new so dont expect a ton of stuff but they are both under heavy development and have funding. Enjoy!