• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    And the last reason to even consider using it goes out the window 🙄 Thanks for the heads-up.

    • BarrierWithAshes
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      Not to even mention the fact a Chinese company owns Opera. Why is it even being considered?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Because it wasn’t based on the Chrome engine (initially, anyway). That’s actually a significant enough reason to at least consider it. I’ve never used Opera precisely because of its origins (honestly I thought it was Russian, though there’s not much practical difference in this case), but innovation is innovation. The fewer non-Chrome browsers exist, the worse off we all are.

        • BarrierWithAshes
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ah, didn’t know how old that doc was. Opera only switched to Chrome in 2013 or so.

          But yeah, I agree. That’s why I support Ladybird’s and Servo’s development. They are the best bet to help stop the duopoly. If only Opera would BSD-license and open source their Presto Engine I would love to see someone pick up development of that. Instead we get Opera putting jumpscares in their browser .

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I’ve not even heard of those two, I’ve stuck with Firefox for so long. I’ll check them out, thanks!

            • BarrierWithAshes
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              They’re both pretty new so dont expect a ton of stuff but they are both under heavy development and have funding. Enjoy!