• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    Different issue. I’m not debating categories of speech. I’m saying that speech that expresses no ideas but that is significantly hateful to a group of people shouldn’t be protected. There are trade offs here: offensive speech that expresses political ideas (beyond “we hate you”) is worthwhile and should be balanced against offense it may cause. I know this isn’t a nice simple black and white answer but I think the real world isn’t nice a simple. There are shades of grey. Other countries might weigh the tradeoffs differently and that’s fine. Doesn’t make this decision wrong, just that the tradeoffs are weighed differently to your intuitions

    • Silejonu
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      That’s a nice word salad to say you support blasphemy laws.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Blasphemy the Holy Ghost then deny the existence of Allah and prove it please. As an atheist you should have zero problems committing the unforgivable sins of the Abrahamic faiths.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            Oh FFS I’m not jumping through tour stupid hoops. Clearly not capable of a good faith discussion

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Everyone check out the totally real not fake atheist here!

              I knew it btw, I knew that anyone advocating cowardly appeasement would have to be afraid of a skydaddy and was so lacking in courage they would even lie.about their beliefs. When the going gets slightly tough we know who hides. Maybe pray harder next time and the zombie-jew will save you ;)