@[email protected] to Curated [email protected]English • 2 years agoTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1370arrow-down111
arrow-up1359arrow-down1imageTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moe@[email protected] to Curated [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish89•2 years agoImplied fact: a baby is capable of having a religion, despite its inability to comprehend the concept.
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish11•2 years agoImplied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•2 years agoActual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish12•2 years agoUnintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoUnimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents’) denomination.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish8•2 years agoI mean, Jewish boys go through a ritual to mark them as part of the religion and christening occurs early too, so I would say that religious people usually assume the baby’s religion.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•2 years agoNon-jewish boys often go through the same ritual, even in a jew-hating religion, because of “tradition”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoNot in my country. But my point still stands as long as there is religious significance to the ritual for some.
Implied fact: a baby is capable of having a religion, despite its inability to comprehend the concept.
7th implication: Religion is genetic
Implied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
Actual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
Unintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
Unimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents’) denomination.
I mean, Jewish boys go through a ritual to mark them as part of the religion and christening occurs early too, so I would say that religious people usually assume the baby’s religion.
Non-jewish boys often go through the same ritual, even in a jew-hating religion, because of “tradition”.
Not in my country. But my point still stands as long as there is religious significance to the ritual for some.
German satire article