@[email protected] to Curated [email protected]English • 1 year agoTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1370arrow-down111
arrow-up1359arrow-down1imageTake that, atheistsfiles.catbox.moe@[email protected] to Curated [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoImplied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish17•1 year agoActual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
minus-squareHonkyTonkWomanlinkfedilinkEnglish12•1 year agoUnintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoUnimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents’) denomination.
Implied fact: by distinguishing the baby as Christian, there must be non-Christian babies in close proximity.
Actual Implication: You’re supposed to care more about the Christian baby than a non-Christian babies.
Unintended Implication: non-Christian babies are less likely to be hurled.
Unimplied fact: all babies in this scenario are likely to hurl, regardless of their (parents’) denomination.