Track_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 years agoLooking for answersslrpnk.netimagemessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up11.78Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.77Karrow-down1imageLooking for answersslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square143fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink17•2 years agoPacifism is only good for aggressors and cowards
minus-squarego $fsck yourselflinkfedilinkEnglish10•2 years agoNon-violence != Pacifism A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 years agoArguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.
Pacifism is only good for aggressors and cowards
Non-violence != Pacifism
A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
Arguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.