Track_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 year agoLooking for answersslrpnk.netimagemessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up11.78Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.76Karrow-down1imageLooking for answersslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square143fedilink
minus-squarego $fsck yourselflinkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoNon-violence != Pacifism A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoArguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.
Non-violence != Pacifism
A person can be an advocate for non-violence and not be a pacifist. No need to conflate the two, particularly when people have so much hate and vitriol for any perceived pacifism.
Arguably, accepting the necessity of occasional violent protest is more reasonable than giving up pacifism.