Summary

Donald Trump has announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on the European Union, claiming the bloc was “formed to screw the United States.”

While details are pending, he suggested the levies would target cars and other imports. The EU, a major U.S. trading partner, has vowed immediate retaliation, with potential tariffs impacting $29.3 billion in exports.

French President Emmanuel Macron had attempted to dissuade Trump, urging focus on China instead.

Critics, including economists and conservative media, warn the tariffs could harm the U.S. economy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1820 days ago

      I mean, we have retaliatory tariffs ready to go too, and I’m not sure they’d be any less damaging.

      If we went nuclear shutting off power to New York and water to Seattle and Boise is a thing we could do.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          320 days ago

          Twice? Are you thinking of the first term thing?

          The last time, it really looked like he panicked when the Dow (predictably, to everyone else) fell. If he blinks every time, yeah, it’s never going to actually happen, although I can’t see him deciding that actually he’s wrong about tariffs being awesome.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            He pushed it by a month again. Now its for sure actually defenitely gonna happen in April Im serious guys no really.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                120 days ago

                Huh. There were some CBC articles floating around saying they were postponed again. I guess not? The articles are gone.

                I feel like nobody knows wtf is going on.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  After I sent this, I saw a clip about it. It looks like he did suggest it was all on April 2 in some interview. If he had it wrong, was deliberately being confusing or what is unclear, but it hardly matters.

                  We’ll see what happens then, basically. Either way, we should be getting the hell away from American dependence.

                • TheLowestStone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  220 days ago

                  I feel like nobody knows wtf is going on.

                  That’s exactly what they want.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        220 days ago

        Water to Seattle? Is this legit because Seattle has no shortage of precipitation or water AFAIK.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          220 days ago

          Assuming their supply is related to the Colombia river system, yes. It looked like all of Washington was in the watershed in the map I saw.

          How badly impacted they’d be by us messing with the upstream supply, I can’t say.

          • AbsentBird
            link
            fedilink
            English
            119 days ago

            The Columbia flows through Eastern Washington, it’s on the other side of a mountain range from Seattle. That’s like threatening to cause an avalanche at Banff to hurt Vancouver.

            In either case it’s the environment that would bear the brunt of the conflict. If you want to hurt Seattle you could just raise our electric bill.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Ah, my bad. So many mountain ranges makes it hard to keep track of what flows where. I’m a little unclear on the bits I’ve been through many times, even.

              Well, IIRC the rest of Washington is a militia-ridden red state, so maybe that’s even better. (Or am I thinking of Oregon?)

              • AbsentBird
                link
                fedilink
                English
                119 days ago

                Both actually, as depressing as that is. The entire region started as the Oregon Territory just before the civil war, and ever since the beginning has had to grapple with far right nutjobs.

                Over time the coastal west of each state became more and more blue and populous, while the east stayed rural and backwards.

                Things are slowly changing though, Spokane county has voted blue for the past decade.

      • TheLowestStone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Do it. I know some people in New York who could use a reality check.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          19 days ago

          And hopefully Trump would care? Last time we blacked them out (by accident) all hell broke loose in just a day, but they don’t vote Republican.

          Come to think of it, we could also cut off land access to Alaska. We’re going to wait for him to escalate this first, though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      The bat needs to bounce back and also hit the fascist ball in the face. Making things worse for everybody for no reason!