• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      618 days ago

      Yeah… NATO is DEFINITELY not sending troops to Ukraine basically ever at this point. Because they increasingly need to be worried about both russia AND the us attacking them.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        Well, that’s the problem with NATO, it was always US interests first and European interests second. Whenever those two diverged, the Europeans just had to sit on their hands (that was the deal, that is why defense spending was not a priority)…but this time it is different: it has proven existential for Europe, regardless of whatever direction the wind may be blowing at that one time in the oval office.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1218 days ago

          Yes. What is different is that now it is going to be every European country in NATO protecting their own interests… from the US and russia.

      • The Quuuuuill
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1618 days ago

        poland, ukraine, and finland are all DEEPLY familiar with the concept…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        518 days ago

        Watch the interview. Trump is scared shitless over the potential of WW3 and UK and France have nukes. If NATO (less US) decided to do something in Ukraine, the most Trump would do is impose tariffs, which is something he was going to do anyway.

        This interview proved Trump to be a coward.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -118 days ago

      Been saying it for a couple of weeks. Also best way to hold Putin to account. I think he goes home if UKraine agrees no NATO.