its so funny how opposite this is to reagan as well. preregan conservatives are so different from reagan conservatives who are so different from maga conservatives. its nuts.
The only consistant thing about conservatives over history is that they are almost always against good social progress, the ones of the past just had more sturdy spines
Being against progress is kinda in the name tho… but i guess they can also be considered progressive, except progressing in an exceptionally shitty way
this is tough because it so is not likely but at the same time I have no interest in defending reagan. I mean the reason he interfered in nicaragua is because of the anti commie garbage. although he might like putin given how capitalist he is nowadays. same with china.
its so funny how opposite this is to reagan as well. preregan conservatives are so different from reagan conservatives who are so different from maga conservatives. its nuts.
The only consistant thing about conservatives over history is that they are almost always against good social progress, the ones of the past just had more sturdy spines
Being against progress is kinda in the name tho… but i guess they can also be considered progressive, except progressing in an exceptionally shitty way
I wish conservatives wanted to conserve the environment
Then to compare them to Mccarthy era these maghats would have been disappeared
Its crazy how you can take the worst of the past with them and they look better than what they currently have.
Yeah, Reagan would probably be selling missiles to Russia to fund drug-smuggling death squads in Nicaragua.
this is tough because it so is not likely but at the same time I have no interest in defending reagan. I mean the reason he interfered in nicaragua is because of the anti commie garbage. although he might like putin given how capitalist he is nowadays. same with china.