• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    52 days ago

    But if you’ve died, then were undead, and then died again, you’d be un-undead right? So alive? It’s basic double jeopardy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You put the double ‘un’ but forgot the double ‘dead’.

      Oh, I didn’t realise you were actually catching the thing mid statement.


      Still:

      • A dead un-dead would be a re-dead, not very alive
      • Considering the 2x dead person is still capable of commenting, I would assume it came back after re-death and is now in some other condition.
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 days ago

        That depends entirely on whether the un- prefix only negates the other un- prefix, or the entire adjective.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 days ago

          The thing is that ‘un’ is different from stuff like ‘not’, ‘non’ and the likes, because it is not just denying the referred word but saying that the effect of the referred word was reverted somehow.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Your silly joke was on Programmer Humour. You might find geeks and nerds here.

              Overthinking is our ikigai.


              Now get out of line and continue with further analysis of the ‘un’