• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    You put the double ‘un’ but forgot the double ‘dead’.

    Oh, I didn’t realise you were actually catching the thing mid statement.


    Still:

    • A dead un-dead would be a re-dead, not very alive
    • Considering the 2x dead person is still capable of commenting, I would assume it came back after re-death and is now in some other condition.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 days ago

      That depends entirely on whether the un- prefix only negates the other un- prefix, or the entire adjective.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 days ago

        The thing is that ‘un’ is different from stuff like ‘not’, ‘non’ and the likes, because it is not just denying the referred word but saying that the effect of the referred word was reverted somehow.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Your silly joke was on Programmer Humour. You might find geeks and nerds here.

            Overthinking is our ikigai.


            Now get out of line and continue with further analysis of the ‘un’