Russia has moved to classify key demographic statistics following a dramatic collapse in its birth rate, which has plunged to levels not seen since the late 18th or early 19th century, according to a leading Russian demographer.

For decades, Russia has been experiencing a plunging birth rate and population decline, which appears to have worsened amid its ongoing invasion of Ukraine—with high casualty rates and men fleeing the country to avoid being conscripted to fight.

Projections estimate that Russia’s population will fall to about 132 million in the next two decades. The United Nations has predicted that in a worst-case scenario, by the start of the next century, Russia’s population could almost halve to 83 million.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1618 days ago

        Some parts of the globe is going to run out of water, some areas of the globe are about to get way too much of it. You know, climate change and all that.

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            618 days ago

            Don’t worry, I check resin codes before recycling. Maybe I should remove the labels though, do you think it’ll help?

      • Dr. Moose
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -9
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        it’s this stupid doomerism that thinks that we will run out of drinkable water and start wars.

        There’s good science that drinkable water is indeed in danger but the doomers ignore the fact that all of this argues about the price of water not the existance of drinkable water. It’ll be more expensive, but the market will create new technologies to filter and desalite water so eventually it’ll balance out.

        In fact, this might be a net good as currently water treatment technology has no investments because water is so plentiful. This means poor regions where water is actually a problem now will get this technology and some balance will be restored to the world.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2218 days ago

          Great, the fucking market that’s already so good at properly distributing food so people don’t starve is also going to handle our water needs. I have no idea why anyone would be panicking about this.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            218 days ago

            Or put another way… We’ve already got more than enough for everyone even with today’s technology. Modern scarcity is artificial, not physical.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              318 days ago

              And dying and depleting rivers are very fucking much physical. I may not see it, my son might not see it, but unless we start thinking as humans and act accordingly, wars for water will come

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          How is this magic technology going to be freely implemented eveywhere and especially in the poorest parts of the world? You description of the mechanisms of invention and investing does not sound at all like how these things actually works in the world we are living in.

          • Dr. Moose
            link
            fedilink
            English
            318 days ago

            I’m genuinely confused by your question. The same way all technology is being delivered? The bigger research market the cheaper is the product and water treatment is no different.

            Our top scientists are not solving water issues because there’s no market for it. African people who go 10km one way to the well don’t have the funding to fund this and in the grand scale of things this is such a small issue that it gains no attention and it’s easier to patch it with temporary solutions and existing inefficient technologies than to invent new stuff.

            This is a very well known problem in the charity scene that applies way beyond this water issue and it’s not some secret issue that nobody knows about it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            618 days ago

            According to this…: https://www.chunkerowaterplant.com/news/water-desalination-cost-per-gallon The cost of desalination per gallon of seawater is “approximately $0.005 to $0.01”

            I would assume people would figure it’s cheaper to pay that cost than to fight wars over it. Most of the planet is covered in water. Like with food, these resource shortages are largely political. The hardest part is removing these power hungry parasites from power. Immense suffering is endured all because of these few billionaire pieces of radioactive shit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              6
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              That’s ignoring the environmental impact. You get brine on the other end that is basically wet salt iirc and if you release it in bulk you will fuck up the nearby environment

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                218 days ago

                With sodium ion batteries becoming practical, I heard that this could actually become a side business for desalination plants to supply battery makers, but I don’t know how viable it is. Regardless, managing brine is still far less of an issue than fighting war over lack of water.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                218 days ago

                Plus you have high energy costs for desalination. Solar energy might help, but the desalination process is slow and needs to run 24 hrs a day to produce enough water efficiently.

          • Dr. Moose
            link
            fedilink
            English
            318 days ago

            You’re building a straw man that is unrelated to the issue at hand. Sure rich hoarding and political issues are bad but we will not run out of water. Period.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              518 days ago

              Context will tell you that we’re talking about losing access to water. If people won’t procreate because they don’t have water, it makes no difference if it’s because we are literally all out of water or if someone else is hoarding it all. In both cases, there’s no access to water.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              Tell that to a river that got depleted by half in a decade or two, along with dying sole (edit: soil) around. Either we do something or next generations won’t live well, rich or not

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            218 days ago

            Yeah every new technological solution has its associated ecological cost. Some are better than others. Guess which ones are the most profitable.

            There’s something called the Kuznets environmental curve that explains this pretty intuitively. It’s an optimistic forecast that I only buy when I’m in a good mood.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuznets_curve

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            118 days ago

            “people are still starving” is an argument so bad as “there is still cancer” and “there are still traffic accidents”. Those issues are not boolean, the are quantifiable and are going down at a very optimistic rate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      117 days ago

      Buddy, that stuff falls out of the sky. It may be more scarce in the future, but we’re not going to run out.

      • Guy Ingonito
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 days ago

        I’m sure nothing bad will happen if we just let the rain water all the crops. That’s probably enough right?