• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    331
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Not to mention the “Governor Trudeau” extra-dumb.

    God I hate politics-by-Twitter. I’m appalled that the US is turning into a fascist country, but I’m even more appalled by how pathetic, puerile and trashy the US’ new fascist overlords are. At least Hitler dressed in Hugo Boss and made speeches that enthralled people: MAGA dresses like tramps, Steve Bannon-stylee and bullies other countries like kids on the playground.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2617 days ago

        No, Twitter is worse IMO. Truth social has always been a steaming pile of shit that non-fascists avoid. Twitter used to be viewed in a positive light and a lot of organizations and governments still use it as a communication medium - sometimes an exclusive communication medium.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          417 days ago

          Twitter used to be viewed in a positive light

          It never was though. Studies always showed that it increase anxiety in the users. Hell, I’m trying to use Bsky to support artists trying to move away from twitter and the while it’s not too bad, the character limit is forcing me to simplify my thoughts to the point that they’re no longer specific enough not to create new conflict. Is this how twitter always was?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            817 days ago

            Twitter was awesome pre-2015 then something happened…can’t quite figure out what brought a bunch of assholes to the platform…hmm…

            And if you feel forced to simplify your thoughts to fit the character limit, you’re simply using the wrong service

            • I Cast Fist
              link
              fedilink
              517 days ago

              Mastodon limits to 500 by default. Alternatives like misskey and pleroma are usually 5k or unlimited

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              117 days ago

              Well, the person I’m commenting under is using the wrong service. But it’s easier to simply not comment or even “engage” in anyway then it is to get into arguments because of a miscommunication.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            517 days ago

            I considered Twitter as one of the horsemen of the apocalypse, and that was years before musk bought it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            117 days ago

            It depends on what you mean my positive light but generally I would say you’re wrong. Twitter had a dedicated fan base well into this decade and was where every business and personality had an account for a reason. Yes people knew of negative social media effecta but Twitter definitely had a fairly wide spread cult following.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              217 days ago

              where every business and personality had an account for a reason

              to sell shit

              Also, it seems weird to say a mainstream social media platform cult following.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                it seems weird to say a mainstream social media platform cult following.

                I agree the word choice is a bit odd. I meant in the sense that Twitter had a dedicated userbase that used it a lot and sort of glorified it. You weren’t talking with your friends or posting online, you were “Tweeting at your mutuals”. The most succinct way I could put it was “cult”, in the same sense that movies and TV have “cult” followings: a dedicated group that enjoys and bases some part of their personality around it.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  217 days ago

                  “Cult following” refer to fanbases for obscure media, like Wraith or Ice Pirates. Star Wars does not have a Cult following.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4717 days ago

      That shows clearly that these tariffs are there to distract (yes it they hurt Americans, Canadians and Mexicans, but he doesn’t care) to make media stop talking about Ukraine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        4617 days ago

        And ukraine is there to distract from tax cuts, and tax cuts and there to distract from the lost of medicare and the lost of medicare is there to distract from them stealing everything, etc etc

        maybe, just maybe, they are just dumb and evil

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          417 days ago

          There’s still a difference between the severity of some of these things.

          With the right leadership America could undo tariffs or the anti-DEI stuff or even drastically redistribute that stolen wealth with the stroke of a pen. The damage to America’s alliances could be repaired over time, especially if they show broad commitment to reforming. These things suck and will hurt but are fixable.

          You can’t sign a piece of paper to unfuck Ukraine, or restore gutted institutional knowledge or depose hereditary president-for-life Trump Jr.

        • Lemminary
          link
          fedilink
          317 days ago

          I’m betting on more evil than dumb but I can be incredibly wrong.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          217 days ago

          Sony forget that the tax cuts actually increase taxes for most working class Americans by $3k a year.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        517 days ago

        It is all to distract from the dismantling of any apparatus that could block his next attempt to stay in power forever.

        This is all misdirection.

    • skulblaka
      link
      fedilink
      1417 days ago

      The fact that they’re not even good at being evil somehow pisses me off even more at the whole situation

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        717 days ago

        To be fair, the nazis were pretty fucking stupid too. The evil-cool, machine-like, storm trooper aesthetic they’re known for is cultivated, at least by a significant portion, by nazis overseas that wanted them to be likeable.

        Some of it is cultural momentum, for sure. I also like Storm Troopers. But nazis really like Storm Troopers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      717 days ago

      Yeah, I remember watching speeches by Hitler back when I was in school. I didn’t understand German so I didn’t know what he was saying, but I could at least appreciate that the Nazis knew how to project power and competence.

      I always understood the fascist aesthetic to be something very macho, very serious-seeming, etc. I always thought the idea was that you had an incredibly charismatic strong-man leader who had all the answers. And, given that, I could understand how people could be taken in.

      But, the MAGA aesthetic is so ugly. Their rhetoric is so unserious. Their leader is so old, fat and caked in orange makeup, and he sounds like an absolute moron. The people attending the rallies do comical things like wearing diapers. And yet, half the US looks at that and thinks: yeah, I’ll vote for them.

      And then there’s Elon Musk. Every time he opens his mouth it’s less and less believable that anything he ever did was the result of skill or competence. Any time he talks about programming or system administration it’s clear he has no fucking clue what he’s talking about. When he talks about gaming he claims he’s one of the top players in the world, and yet it’s obvious he’s barely played the games involved. But, apparently Americans are so brainwashed that being rich means you’re “a genius”.

      I hated George W. Bush, but at least I could understand how some people found his schtick endearing. I could understand how he harnessed people’s fear and hate and turned it into support for his “war on terrah”. But, with Trump my opinion of Americans has gone down to the lowest level ever. This is what works for you? Really??

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      417 days ago

      Not to mention the “Governor Trudeau” extra-dumb.

      Trudeau is probably above that, but it would be mildly amusing if he started calling Trump “comrade Trump” or maybe “vice-president Trump”

      • Papamousse
        link
        fedilink
        316 days ago

        He called him “Donald” and republicans/maga are outraged!!! lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        We should all be calling him by his real name, “VP Krasnov”.

        ETA: and “Murca” is now glorious “KRASNOVIA

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    17017 days ago

    lol ours is retaliatory but theirs are reciprocal?

    Eat shit asshole.

    This guy doesn’t even understand those words. They’ve got someone writing his tweets now.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1717 days ago

      Seems like it. It’s not all in caps and misspelled. Can’t even claim it’s AI because at least it would try to duplicate him

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1317 days ago

        He definitely has handlers writing his tweets. There was an analysis last time, coherent posts were written from an Android phone (the handler), rambling posts in all caps from an iPhone (Trump).

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          717 days ago

          Eh I deleted the comment because it can be taken horribly out of context, but what I meant was my ADHD medication gives me really weird thoughts late at night. But hey, I prefer weird thoughts to the depressing shit I think about without it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    14517 days ago

    All Trudeau needs to do is implement a reciprocal tariff that also increases by like amount. Boom, now you have an infinite tariff loop and a single transaction in either direction is enough to create infinite GDP.

    Checkmate, economists.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4017 days ago

      Ya honestly Trump is so fucking stupid that it’s starting to feel like he’s doing a bit. Like is he mocking his own supporters at this point? I think the world needs to respond to trump with something exactly like this. Infinite tariff loop is actually a policy I would support unironically.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            117 days ago

            Nope, look it up, it’s undefined.

            You can define things that boil down to 0 x infinity that equal anything you like. It’s undefined and is dependent on context. Infinity isn’t this one number, it’s a concept that encompasses a lot of things, and the way you achieve an infinity matter.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              117 days ago

              Isn’t it anything divided by 0 is undefined? Granted, I only have a more or less intermediate level of math, but I was always taught that multiplication by zero is always zero. But then again, zero is weird and can break my brain just as much as infinity does.

              • @[email protected]
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                316 days ago

                Indeed, any number multiplied by 0 is zero, but infinity is not a number.

                So then it starts to depend on what the 0 actually means, and what the infinity actually means, and depending on the context 0 x infinity can be all kinds of things.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    14117 days ago

    Ok it’s starting to feel like a game now. Can we cause American hyperinflation by a targeted tariff feedback loop?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6717 days ago

      Or like the sort of thing a hostile foreign government might really want to have happen to the US…

      Good thing we have agent Krasnov at the helm.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2117 days ago

      Tbh, I’ve been pondering just how regulated organized market manipulation is nowadays. With the market going through “corrections” because of tariffs and the FCC being completely defanged, a large group of organized retail investors have the opportunity to get up to some pretty funny business.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1417 days ago

        If by “funny business” you mean raise prices on products that don’t actually have tariffs on them, then it’s a safe bet that yeah, there’s going to be some funny business.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1217 days ago

      No, because Canada’s economy will collapse long before the US economy if each side just keeps increasing tariffs. What Canada needs to do is make things cheaper for Canadians, not more expensive.

      Take any law related to US intellectual property and decriminalize that.

      Violating the copyright on Hollywood movies? Go for it. No charge.

      Something you want to do is covered by a patent held by an American? Do it, you won’t be prosecuted.

      Want to bypass DRM on a tractor, a printer, an iPhone, sell or give away tools to allow anybody else to do it? Feel free.

      The biggest advantage of this approach is that if the US did the same thing with respect to Canadian IP, they’d have so much less to work with. The US has geared its economy towards producing IP, and then used trade deals to demand that other countries respect that IP or the US will put tariffs on their stuff. Well, clearly the US isn’t holding up its end of that bargain, so fuck 'em.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        216 days ago

        The only difference is we’re putting tariffs on things that we can source elsewhere vs the blanket tariffs from the states. But I agree we should also do all the IP stuff you mentioned.

    • Papamousse
      link
      fedilink
      216 days ago

      Canada should add a 100% tariff on USA crude oil that we import (Canada import 0 I guess) and with trump reciprocal thinggy, automatically crude oil from Canada to USA would have a 100% tariff on it lol

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4317 days ago

      He also wants his face on currency

      You have to be dead before that happens.

      I’m sure someone would be willing to help

      • Laurel Raven
        link
        fedilink
        English
        717 days ago

        I don’t think there’s any law requiring that

        Not that it would matter if there was, mind you, seeing as there’s a whole thing in the Constitution about not having insurrectionists who broke their oath to uphold the Constitution be allowed to ever hold elected office again, and well…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1317 days ago

      For my fellow Americans, the best way to respond if Trump gets his face on currency is to go full cashless. Let his ass sit abandoned and forgotten in bank vaults across the country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1217 days ago

        I’ve heard a joke that utilizes a dollar boll for the execution normally. A challenge to find a bird, a National monument, a dairy product, and an award-winning film on the dollar.

        The joke is not legal to do. The first two are obvious and legal.

        1. An eagle
        2. The picture on the back
        3. Half & Half (tear it in half)
        4. Gone with the Wind (throw the pieces in the air)

        Not something people could feasibly do since it’s an expensive AND illegal joke, but would still be funny.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7917 days ago

    Look forward to the day that orange shit stain is dead. Hopefully tonight.

    Americans: Just imagine the White House is an elementary school…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        If Vance were president Republican spines would start to grow back. Trump’s hold over Republicans is a major part of the problem.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1117 days ago

          Vance might not be The Guy, but I disagree that removing Trump solves the problem at all. He’s more like the most prominent symptom.

          Before 2016, Trump in the minds of most Americans was some washed up reality show star from the 90s. He is, and has always been, an ugly, uncharismatic, racist piece of shit. If the conservative propaganda machine can propel this artificially colored, barely articulate moron to the top, they can propel just about anyone. The only caveat is that whoever they propel has to be willing to do anything, to destroy any international relationship, to flip flop at the drop of a hat, and to not ask questions outside of “how will this benefit me?”

          Vance might be a selfish, uncharismatic idiot in his own right, but unlike Trump he does have two braincells to rub together. Fox, Newsmax, Rogan, and the like might not be willing to throw themselves behind that. But there’s no shortage of vaguely remembered, self-absorbed celebrities who will be willing to take his place. Think President Oz, or heck, maybe Hulk Hogan would throw his hat in the ring.

          Point is, as long as we have a populace that disrespects education and science, and that’s completely unmotivated to participate in our gerrymandered and unrepresentative FPTP system, the propaganda machine will always churn out a shittier asshole next year. The worst of us will hand them the reigns, and Republicans will follow that asshole without question. Trump isn’t as special a case as people want to believe. We’ve been on this trajectory for decades.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            217 days ago

            You need to find a way to get the non-voting 35% of the eligible voter population to actually vote.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              617 days ago

              And also vote in their own interest. Near as I can tell, their lack of belief in the system stems from their lack of interest in learning about it as much as its actual flaws. One of the big strengths of conservatives is drawing in first time voters who don’t know jack about squat by playing on their fears–as racist and stupid as those fears may be.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2317 days ago

        I don’t think Vance has the charisma or character to keep the MAGA interests from eating each other and him.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 days ago

        One hopes Vance doesn’t have the same vice grip on the balls of the Republican Party that Trump does.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 days ago

        Yeah… This.

        Don’t get me wrong, if/when Trump dies, it’ll be a day that I’m a bit happier, but if he dies during his presidency, I know he’ll be immediately replaced by someone who is either just as bad or worse.

        My only hope with Vance if he takes on the job, is that he’s such a fucking bootlicker that hopefully he’ll spend too much time sucking off corporate interests that he can’t do too much more damage than Trump has already done.

        It’s possible, however unlikely, that someone will convince Vance to do the right thing for the wrong reasons (he definitely won’t do it for the right reasons), because someone else told him too… I have no illusions that he wouldn’t come up with the idea himself. He’s just not that bright in my mind.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    75
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    The real problem is that Trump’s supporters don’t understand tariffs, and wouldn’t believe the explanation anyway because to them it just sounds like Orange Man Bad.

    When the US imposes a tariff on Canada, importers of Canadian goods pay the tariff to the US government. To recover that cost they raise the prices they charge American customers. So Americans end up paying the tariff. The only damage it does to Canada is that the tariff could discourage US importers from buying certain goods from Canada if they can get them somewhere else without paying a tariff. That happens in some cases, but in others Canada is already the cheapest (or only) source of a high-demand item, so Americans will just pay the higher prices - the way they’re still paying jacked-up COVID prices for so many things, for example.

    Millions of Americans, being too dumb or unwilling to grasp this, think these tariffs are Trump heroically saving them from the evils of foreigners who want to destroy their Freedom.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2517 days ago

      not to mention any potential compound tariffs on complex goods likes automobiles for example.

      Prices skyrocket immensely.

      The housing market is only going to get more expensive, etc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        917 days ago

        By compound tariffs, do you mean extra tariff fees due to repeated trips across the border in the manufacturing process?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          Ya. I watched the Doug Ford announcement, and he said parts can cross the Ontario border up to 8 times before making it into the vehicle or final product.

          so $10 part -> $12.50 -> $15.625 -> $19.531 -> $24.414 -> $30.517 -> $38.146 -> $47.683 -> $59.60

          So that $10 part from the first factory is now $59.60 and that’s before the fact that it probably increases in value at each step along the way to being refined into it’s final product.

          Thats why he’s saying (as well as others) that they expect the factories on both sides to shut down within a couple weeks.

          Edit: half of that if it’s a one way tariff where both sides didn’t put tariffs on the exact same items.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          215 days ago

          yeah, exactly. Complex manufacturing chains often ship things all over the place, if you’re crossing the border 2-3 times, that’s 2-3 times as many tariffs being charged. Which depending on what you’re doing, can be a lot of money.

          The auto industry in particular is susceptible to this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      417 days ago

      Tariffs, and other taxes, are not entirely passed to the consumer. The producers are also losing money because they’re selling less. Taxes are paid both by the consumer and the producers, the proportion on how much each part pay is unknown for me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1217 days ago

        Let’s say a bottle of Canadian Maple Syrup is $5 before.

        25% Tariff is $1.25

        Let’s say the company makes $2 on each bottle before tariff. They really need to make $2 per bottle to cover expenses

        So if a company still wants to make $2 a bottle still.

        If they sell for $6.25 to try to cover the tariff (25% increase)

        The tariff becomes $1.56

        Instead of making $5, they would make $4.69.

        Instead of $2, they would make $1.69

        If they sold the bottle for $5, paid $1.25 tariff

        They would make 75 cents

        The number for $5 is $6.67

        If the company sold the syrup bottle for $6.67. Payed $1.67 in tariff (25%). They would make $2.

        Now, of course, they want to sell it for $6.67. Will people pay the increased price?

        They can’t just keep selling them for $5 and make basically a 1/3 of their previous profit.

        Prices have to go up. How much is up to the consumer.

        If the consumer is willing to buy Official Canadian Maple Syrup 🍁 for $6.67. The consumer is paying the whole $1.67 tariff.

        An interesting thing happens when people pay $8. The syrup company makes an extra $1, Government gets $2 tariff. It’s a win for everyone, but the consumer that lost $3. (Kind of scary if Trump gets a Maple Syrup company in Canada, goes around, ignores, or pays himself the tariff and sells a bottle for $5. Both are true Canadian Maple Syrup, it just has his name on it. Are you going to buy the $5 or the $8? Even if you buy the $8, he gets $2)

        The consumer can’t win. Free economy is better.

        ~33% increase covers a 25% tariff

        If the price settles at $6.

        Company pays 50 cents

        Consumer pays $1

        Trump gets $1.50

        Who even is in charge of the “tariff funds”?

        Like people are happy with having to pay $1 to get the company to pay 50 cents? Like that’s a win?

        Sad reality is Americans should not buy anything with a tariff. Paying a premium to help support Canada seems like a good thing but if everyone does it and everyone pays 33% more. The tariff funds makes out like a bandit all thanks to the consumers.

        TL;DR: Company facing a 25% tariff will look to raise prices 33%. If they can they are fine or better. Consumers lose. I really like Vermont Maple Syrup

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          017 days ago

          Would you mind changing “instead of making, they make” by some other precise verbs? Your explaination seems very interesting but, probably du to my poor english, I feel like you saying the same thing over and over while changing the numbers and I can’t grasp your explanation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            116 days ago

            So if a company still wants to make $2 profit per bottle.

            Company raises price to $6.25 to try to cover the tariff (25% increase)

            The tariff becomes $1.56 ($6.25 × 25%)

            Instead of selling for $5 price, they would sell it for $4.69 effectively ($6.25-$1.56)

            Instead of making $2 profit, they would make $1.69 profit ($4.69-$3(production cost))

            If they still sold the bottle for $5, paid $1.25 tariff

            They would make 75 cents of profit ($5-$3(production cost)-$1.25(tariff))

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              116 days ago

              I see. Since the tarif is proportionate to the final price, the final price needs even higher than the initial price times (1 + tarif) in order to keep the profit the same.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                216 days ago

                No, because (1 + tariff) isn’t enough to keep up with the tariff because as the price goes up, the tariff also goes up.

                Like in the example going from $5 to $6.25 (5 × (1+.25)). Would result in 31 cents less per bottle.

                It needs to be ~33% more or $6.67 for the syrup company to keep the same profit with a 25% tariff.

                Final Price × Tariff % = Tariff Amount

                Final Price - Tariff Amount = Cost of Good Sold

                Cost of Good Sold - Expenses = Profit

                So if you need $2 profit

                $2 = (Final Price - (Final Price × Tariff %)) - Expenses

                $2 = (X - (X×.25)) - $3

                $5 = X - .25X

                $5 = .75X

                X = $6.67

                Formula would be

                Profit = (Final Price - (Final Price × Tariff %)) - Expenses

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                216 days ago

                Starting Price / (1-Tariff %) = Final Price Needed to Break Even

                $5 / (1-.25) =

                5/.75 = $6.67

                If an item was $5 and there was a 30% tariff

                5 / (1-.30) = $7.14

                If there was a 30% tariff and the syrup company wanted to keep same profit they would have to sell each bottle for $7.14.

                $7.14 × .30 = $2.14

                $7.14 - $2.14 = $5

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        117 days ago

        There is both downward price pressure and reduced demand.

        It does not change the “who pays” question.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      417 days ago

      The areas where they overwhelmingly voted for the orange dumbass are in for a shock. Here is a list of the products that canda has put tariffs on.

      https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2025/03/list-of-products-from-the-united-states-subject-to-25-per-cent-tariffs-effective-march-4-2025.html

      Combined with a strong dollar that’s a huge blow to U.S. agriculture and manufacturing. FYI U.S. Agriculture is in the worst overall depression of the past 50 years. The strong dollar has basically has given the entire industry a beating.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      The guy had a pretty good aim. It was down to luck.

      I think the shittier part of this is that if that whole thing hadn’t happened, Trump might have not won. He got the best PR of his whole campaign during that one minute.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        516 days ago

        Eh he was gonna win whether or not that happened. It helped his image certainly, but he was already well on the way to winning and Biden was already increasingly unpopular.

        If the guy actually shot him we probably would have been okay though cuz I don’t think Vance has the same pull with the Maga base

  • Joker
    link
    fedilink
    6217 days ago

    @imvii Perhaps since little donny says he does not need anything from Canada we should shut off his electric and oil now. That would be before he could effectively replace it.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2617 days ago

      I’m down for it.

      There is a little buzz that Trump is going to back pedal in a day or two, which would be hilarious. But I think we keep the pressure on even if he does.

      None of this back and forth shit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1317 days ago

        If he backpedals I still hope the LCBO donated all that American liquor to the Legion and bars for one ultra liquor holiday.

        They pulled the trigger, I don’t want that shit back on the shelves, even if they do call taksies backsies.

        • useyourvoice
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1017 days ago

          They better not put that shit back on the shelves. It’s the 2nd time that we’ve pulled it off the shelves, and we keep putting it back on. FOR WHAT

          • Caedarai
            link
            fedilink
            716 days ago

            It’s better to just sell it and not replenish the stock than to dispose of it all at a massive loss. The US sellers won’t get more money either way, but this way some losses can be avoided on the Canadian side.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              216 days ago

              “While Ontario-based retailers will have the discretion to sell whatever stock they have on hand, they will no longer be able to buy U.S. products from LCBO,” the email continues.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        617 days ago

        Agreed. No backing down now. Keep the pressure on and increasing. This isn’t ending any time soon.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5716 days ago

    God I’m exhausted.

    At this point, we just need to cut it all off completely. Oil shipments, electricity, lumber, aluminum. All of it.

    I know that that’s a hard ask for those industries that are affected, and if it means the federal goverment has to temporarily raise the deficit in order to subsidize those industries it’ll be crazy expensive and inflation will shoot up. But I’m convinced that that would be only a short amount of time that that would actually be needed.

    Let the United States go one week without our stuff. 100%…fuck 'em. They’ll last one week. Maybe two. And when they quit their bullshit, make it clear that we are diversifying our business partners making it easier to pull it from them again anytime they let Trump open is fucking mouth.

    Hold our resources hostage against them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I mean, if we play all our cards at once, we have no cards left for the next thing, and in the process that might raise enough American political will to invade for real.

      It should be and I think is all on the table, though, and I have no problem with it if they want to escalate, because we also need to raise political will to sever our ties for good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        616 days ago

        we have no cards left for the next thing,

        That’s the game, he’s bleeding you for cards.

        If he’s going to attack you, he’ll bleed you first. There is no appeasing him permanently.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          We have a deep deck (which is part of why playing the whole thing at once would be kinda nutty). Like every day someone mentions a new way to screw with them I hadn’t thought of. Cutting off power, cutting off water, taking their stuff and not paying, ignoring their intellectual property, cutting off Alaska…

          Nobody is talking appeasement anymore, even Danielle Smith is getting muted about it. The question is how to help Trump ruin himself the best, politically and economically.

    • Constant Pain
      link
      fedilink
      116 days ago

      Economical MAD is not the answer here. It’s a very complex subject that is difficult to solve.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2016 days ago

        It’s a very complex subject that is difficult to solve

        In a sane world, I agree with you. But we’re dealing with a man who himself doesn’t realise its complexity and only understands strategies that are “blunt and absurd”.

        We can use as nuanced and soft-toed strategies all we want and he’ll never get it through his orange head.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          016 days ago

          Yes, we’re dealing with a madman. You’re suggesting we act just like him. No, harming more people voluntarily is not the answer.

          • Pup Biru
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            (not canadian, or american; take that as you will)

            not acting like him: acting in retaliation with measures that hurt the US more than canada… things like IP and copyright protections, digital services, etc

            his blanket measures don’t take into account trade that’s largely beneficial to US companies - they’re stupid blunt instrument crap because thought is too hard… trump hurt himself in his confusion

            retaliating in precise ways can extract value from the US without harming the canadian economy nearly as much

            • ᴍᴜᴛɪʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ
              link
              fedilink
              English
              316 days ago

              As I saw someone link yesterday, John Bolton (noted warmongering piece of shit) said he was in the room during Trump round one when people were trying to explain tariffs to him. Bolton says he was unable to comprehend.

              • Pup Biru
                link
                fedilink
                English
                216 days ago

                absolutely… and in those hands they can still be a damaging weapon, but they’ll never be as powerful as someone who knows how to wield them correctly. brains can win, or at least provide a formidable fight… but no matter what, both sides will feel pain

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        The destruction is mutual, but not assured and total (total just didn’t make it into the acronym). Nuclear war isn’t a good analogy.

        Basically, do we want to continue relying on the US, or not? Not doing so has a cost, but we might not have a choice. Canada can survive without the US, if in a slightly poorer form.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Canada still has decent friends to trade and work with. Can’t say the same for the Fascist States.

        • ᴍᴜᴛɪʟᴀᴛɪᴏɴᴡᴀᴠᴇ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          216 days ago

          I worry that Canada will not be able to export efficiently due to lack of port infrastructure, especially on the Pacific Coast. Massive industrial ports are expensive and take years to bring online.

          • djsoren19
            link
            fedilink
            English
            416 days ago

            Y’know, if you’re willing to make a few small concessions on who is ultimately in control of your country, I know this great authoritarian dictatorship that’s been investing in new port infrastructure projects all around the world.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            316 days ago

            Yes, me too. It’s really hard to find information on how much extra capacity there is, although I’ve seen indications it’s not zero.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5417 days ago

    It will be a shit show until Canada and the rest of the western world work out agreements independent of the US.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2317 days ago

      Isolating a fascist power with the strongest military in the world doesn’t work. Eventually they work up the balls to use it.

      Every nation should be prepared for what happens when the purge of the US military and government is complete and only loyalists hold power.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1517 days ago

        Given that there are no ideal moves in any direction, I feel that standing up to the bully is the only option on the table. They failed to do that in 1939.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        817 days ago

        And another thing. Its America’s job to police this mess, they installed him either directly or indirectly. The rest of the world didn’t ask or vote for this dangerous toddler.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                216 days ago

                Don’t fret… I have absolutely no expectations that Americans can pull out of this power dive. I just hope that most of the damage will be self inflicted.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          No joke, I can see UK and France offering nuclear retaliation response promise to Canada, outside of NATO. I think trump really is dumb enough to start real war with for example Canada. NATO is dead, rest of the west needs to make similar protection agreements without USA, besides NATO , for when shit really hits the fan (I think it will, it’s a matter of when, not if).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              16 days ago

              From article 5 from the NATO treaty actually. It states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members.

              Edit: the article or nato treaty doesn’t state it that explicitly actually. But a quick google show that it’s at least the consensus interpretation

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                216 days ago

                it states that it applies to attacks from external actors, i.e. non-members

                Which America would be if they leave NATO…

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                16 days ago

                It has been hotly debated, mostly in regards to Greece and Türkiye, who have been at each other’s throats for decades. In that case, the aggressor likely wouldn’t be obvious and both are likely to claim article 5. Their relations to other NATO members are also a lot more ambiguous, some favoring one, some the other.

                In the case of a rogue USA attacking Canada, or Denmark, I believe the case would be a lot clearer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2017 days ago

      Over here in the EU we still need gas and oil. I’d much rather import it from Canada than from Qatar or some other middle eastern dictatorship.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        As a Canadian I agree but that is difficult. Canada is so integrated with the US that they basically refine all of our crude. Canadian crude is unlike crude from anywhere else and has to be refined a certain way. So we have to build refineries or you do, that can handle our capacity. That takes time and certainly won’t be instantaneous. It’s not like we can just divert.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          116 days ago

          Yeah plus the transport would be much more expensive. But I guess building your own refineries will give much more flexibility for the future…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1517 days ago

      We’re already doing that. EVERYBODY is doing that. every western nation is doing their best to cut America out of their trading deals. Donnie has seriously fucked America over.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5216 days ago

    Bankrupting his country like he did with all his businesses, including a casino. Notoriously difficult to bankrupt.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          516 days ago

          Yes, he’s banned from running charities. But not just him. His whole family is banned because they were all in on it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            216 days ago

            Sadly it would probably have been way better for the world if they had stuck to defrauding kids charities. Its my belief that capitalism keeps evil people busy amassing money and fighting each other in the business sphere, rather than doing worse to amass power and influence.