• Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    2262 months ago

    Sorry for multiple posts, but my points are different.

    Impose tariffs on Denmark? Do you all know what we import from Denmark? Medication and medical devices. So that would further increase the cost of healthcare in the US. He already signed an executive order to undo the $35 insulin cap for Medicaid recipients. He is actively raising healthcare prices.

    Tariffs would only hurt both countries.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1292 months ago

      It all makes sense when you accept that he’s been installed by our enemies to destroy the US.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      482 months ago

      It’s also an integrated EU economy, so I’d assume the entire European single market would retaliate.

      But yeah, he doesn’t care about or understand that. Or at least won’t until there’s active unrest in America over the crazy inflation and layoffs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 months ago

        Yes, to add you cannot impose targeted tariffs on Danish goods, as these are typically traded within the EU before going to the US.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          To date, it hasn’t been the president’s fault. The shit they do makes it’s way to workers and consumers well after they leave office, for the most part. This would be different, and in some cases very uneven - if there’s an accross-the-board 25% tariff with Canada, the Detroit auto industry basically shuts down and lays everyone off today.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      462 months ago

      Tariffs seem to be Trump’s go-to move nowadays. “Grab them by the wallet”.

      • To Putin: stop the war or tariffs!
      • To Europe: buy more US oil or tariffs!
      • To Denmark: gimme Greenland or tariffs!
      • To Melania (probably): pretend you can still bear being in the same room with me or tariffs!
      • McDonald’s - “cash or card, sir?” “Tariffs!”
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 months ago

        His voters still don’t seem to have figured out that just means things will cost them more.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        192 months ago

        Not “Grab them” but “Grab the US consumer”. Tariffs raise prices inside the USA. The target country only loses by being less competitive in the US market.

        Trump wants to raise import taxes on goods from everyone, so only US goods are competitive. Trouble is the US has exported a bunch of manufacturing so it must import.

    • Wowbagger
      link
      fedilink
      English
      392 months ago

      There is no way to impose tariffs on Danish goods. We’re part of the EU, and the inner market, so we’ll just send the goods from some other EU country. So any tariff on Denmark would have to be a tariff on EU.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      302 months ago

      It would hurt both countries, but Denmark can still sell their medication and medical devices to the rest of the world.

      These tariffs in general are going to hurt Americans far more than anyone else.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      Do you all know what we import from Denmark? Medication

      Ozempic comes to mind. It’s still under patent, so I guess there’s no other source than Novo Nordisk in Denmark.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 months ago

      Do you think he cares?

      That is very on brand for trump. Pissing off a former ally and messing up healthcare worse for “his own” country.

    • Cris
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      Wait he seriously undid the cap already??? Fucking for real?

      Like I shouldn’t be surprised…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As an European it’s pretty clear now that the US is our enemy. This is just the start. We really need to put our military in order and prepare for the inevitable attack.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 months ago

      It’s impossible to catch up to the US war machine in 4 years only. We can only start the process, but I also doubt the US would sit by idly and let us become too powerful.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        302 months ago

        The nice thing is that Trump will replace our best generals and other leadership with utter incompetents.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Not so. If a soldier is given an unlawful order, they are obligated to refuse it. If they decide to follow such an order, they are not innocent, it’s on their own heads, and I have zero sympathy for war criminals. Wanna guess how I can tell you never served?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -112 months ago

              You never served if you think disobeying orders is gonna blow over in the way you outlined here

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Blow over? Who ever said anything about that?

                It takes courage to be a conscientious objector, especially in the face of fascism. Many good men have been murdered for refusing orders to murder civilians. Despite the consequences, it’s the only ethical position possible.

                Refusing unlawful orders is drilled into us in boot camp for damn good reasons. You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        262 months ago

        We don’t really need the power to be able to attack the US. Just enough to be able to defend ourselves and that is far from impossible even in 4 years.

    • Sippy Cup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 months ago

      Don’t worry. The US may have the most experienced, well funded, and outfitted military on the planet, but the bafoons at the top keep getting in the way of the military executing a war the way it wants to.

      See: Iraq 2, WMD boogaloo, or the cult classic Vietnam: Congress goes to war.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You really aren’t even joking at all. This is what happens when Congress gets out of the way of the military.

        https://youtu.be/rD2C1H-dzzI

        Dude has a channel dedicated to telling the unbelievable stories of what our soldiers have done when the leash comes off.

        Warning: dude is a conservative, so his takes on socialism and communism are what you’d expect

        • Sippy Cup
          link
          fedilink
          English
          112 months ago

          I wasn’t kidding in the slightest. If the DoD had executed the second Iraq invasion it would have taken a few days. But Rumsfeld and his croneys insisted on it being done their way, and they didn’t know shit about fuck when it came to warfare. (Note: this may have been because Rumsfeld was lying and committing crimes that, had the military done things the way they wanted, would have been exposed.)

    • Hanrahan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      As an Australian I wish we’d negotiate to join the EU. Philosophically we have more in common with the EU then America and together is better.

      But we cant even join with New Zealand and od not ne suporsed if the EU didnt want us, I’d not want us, though we do all seem to mostly hate immigrants so we have that in common :(

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Our previous governments have tied us to the US so tightly that we may as well be a US vassal state. Whatever America’s foreign policy is, is Australia’s policy. Our military is dependent on the US for its equipment.

        It would be great to have more ties to the EU and SE Asian counties but thats unlikely to happen unfortunately.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        Side note, New Zealand can however decide to join us. The Australian constitution has a provision that a successful referendum in New Zealand admits them to the Federation.

        Given the All Blacks record however this is unlikely.

  • magnetosphere
    link
    fedilink
    1112 months ago

    The man is utterly deranged. During his last term, one of the few things I was grateful for was that he didn’t start a new war. Apparently, he’s planning to make up for that.

  • acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    782 months ago

    I can’t wait for the US to enter the “find out” phase. It will take some time, sure, but heh, hubris always invites nemesis.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      512 months ago

      Yeah… Some country’s “find out” phase in history occurred only after unspeakable horrors were committed and the country was crushed jnto submission by an international coalition. So… Idk

      • jrs100000
        link
        fedilink
        English
        332 months ago

        Yea I dont think anyone is going to enjoy the “find out” phase of this one. Maybe Putin, if he lives that long.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        The find out phase also might mean come countries with equally unhinged leaders feel emboldened to attack others, as countries start divesting from their US relations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      I just hope the rest of the world takes mercy on those of us US citizens who just wanna live our lives in peace.

      • acargitz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 months ago

        I’m more thinking in terms of: if you turn your back on your friends, they will turn their backs to you. Specifically: NATO article 5 has been invoked only once in NATO’s history, after the September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001. And we were there for you, no questions asked. Now your country is threatening a NATO ally. Tread carefully.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          I mean, I have no say in what my country actually does. I highly disapprove of it all, in fact. But I would hope that if the rest of the world kicked in our door to stop our shit, that regular citizens like me wouldn’t be in danger of being shot or whatever. I just wanna live my life, man.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              Yeah, but how can I stop the dumbass in charge from doing shit that’s bad? I voted and he still got in.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                I don’t have answers, sorry. Maybe just remind others who can vote that they need to and that any pain they feel is solely a result of that dumbass being elected, no matter who he tries to blame.

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        I think it’s going to be choose our have it chosen for you.

  • shoulderoforion
    link
    fedilink
    762 months ago

    Trump ginning up beef with Greenland and Panama, for “security” and “defense” is all simply to grant geopolitical cover to Putin for Russia’s invasion and ultimate annexation of Ukraine. “Watch me do the same thing as Russia for the same reasons” gives the world a second Imperialist foil, regardless of Trump’s actual intent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 months ago

      I don’t feel safe, so I’m going to take my neighbours land. Then the bastard says no, and tells me to leave. I came back with a few friends to tell him he has no choice, or we will take it by force.

      Now all my neighbours are angry at me. I don’t understand it, I’m just trying to feel safe!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Eh, it seems to me there’s lots of way less galaxy brain ways to do that if your Trump. And he’s not exactly a mastermind.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    682 months ago

    Summary:

    In a recent 45-minute phone call, U.S. President Donald Trump reiterated his demand for the United States to gain control over Greenland, an autonomous Danish territory. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen firmly responded that Greenland is not for sale. According to European officials, the conversation was aggressive, with Trump threatening punitive tariffs against Denmark if it refused to relinquish control of Greenland. Frederiksen proposed enhanced cooperation on military bases and mineral exploitation in Greenland, but Trump dismissed these offers, insisting on full U.S. control. This development has heightened concerns in Europe about strained transatlantic relations, especially following Trump’s recent threats of heavy tariffs on the EU and demands for increased defense spending from NATO allies.

      • Justin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        422 months ago

        Denmark is normally otherwise an ally of the US.

        However, this call has spooked the Danes. There will 100% be escalations from the Danes to protect themselves as a result.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Everyone knows Trump is a dick, and the US is mega powerful. The debate in the rest of the world is how to deal with it. Using “honey” and using “vinegar” are both in the running. Honey remains more popular because chummyness is an old reflex with the US, and most well-to-do Westerners still don’t get what’s happening.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Why is Denmark even offering anything at all

        As others have pointed out, the US play here is likely to be stopping payments for the current US military based in Greenland but not leaving, testing its limits (operating outside of the designated areas), and generally just begging for a response. At this point the Danish (and the EU generally) will have to choose - if they do nothing then it’ll encourage more of this BS in Greenland and elsewhere. If they respond with any force it’ll be what Trump wants. He’ll use it as pretense for…whatever he wants to do.

        This behaviour will make it far less likely that all of the US international partners will renew military base leases or sign new ones, and long term it will diminish American military power globally, but nobody in MAGA let alone Trump are really thinking beyond the immediate anyways.

        So the answer your question, the Danes are trying to avoid all of that BS.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        Dude probably thinks Trump is an actual business man and is over selling what he wants and actually wants something way less. That ain’t trump, no 5d chess here.

    • 100
      link
      fedilink
      152 months ago

      well thats one way to increase nato spending

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    632 months ago

    I love that the map in the article only labels a few locations, but one of them is the Gulf of Mexico.

    Nice subtle dig at the man-baby.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    632 months ago

    It is wild to think that EU-US relations might worsen because Trump wants to annex Greenland, jeez.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    462 months ago

    I don’t know why the Danish PM would waste his time even talking to Traitorapist Trump. The whole world knows Trump is a notorious liar.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Probably just didn’t know and the majority of heads of state are men so it’s not an unfair assumption. I certainly didn’t know she was a woman and I wouldn’t have looked it up to get the right pronouns in a post on here.

  • ssillyssadass
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 months ago

    The US will be spending the next several decades building their reputation back up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Uh… I think it’s never coming back.

      We had our chance to course correct, and didn’t. And I suspect dems are either going to learn nothing and flop the next election, literally get suppressed by Trump, or get their own version of a “liberal Trump.”

      Our social media is only going to get more toxic now, and it’s already dominating public discourse.

      I dunno where you live, friend, but do not assume the US is digging its way out of this hole :(

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Were you making the assumption that the US had a good reputation before that ?

        Half of the world hated it outright and the other half was mostly just playing along because of its economic or military power and propensity to behave like a bully.

        The only difference is that Trump is too stupid to do it quietly.

      • Drusas
        link
        fedilink
        212 months ago

        It will come back eventually. The Germans were Nazis for a while and we like them now.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          322 months ago

          Yea, but they were fixed by military, economic and political means. Nobody is big enough to fix the US.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            222 months ago

            The US is big enough to stop the US, we’ve done it before and I’m fairly certain Georgia is still flammable.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              152 months ago

              It would be nice to avoid a civil war (that would be more useful to enemies), but if you go to war with allies, it starts to become less unthinkable.

          • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 months ago

            Nobody is big enough to fix the US.

            Time to split the US then? East US gets to keep Washington DC, West US creates new capital city in Oregon?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Unless “fix” means “into a totalitarian neo-Maoist state”. If anyone defeats the US, they’re not imposing liberal democracy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          The Germans are currently having a fascist resurgence right now as well. I hope their elections go well where they can form functional coalitions.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      No way that is ever happening. We are a dying empire, rotting from the inside out. Because of a massive amount of inertia, the decline is really only starting to become obvious widely, but we are well into the phase where the ruling class has given up and is just looting the carcass before it hits the ground. They have succeeded in distracting the general public from the dire circumstances for a long time, but things are so far gone at this point, that won’t really be necessary much longer. As we proceed to give up on democracy, the efficacy of political influence withers away. The real danger for the world is that we have a massive military infrastructure ready to lash out in increasingly desperate spasms as the organism desperately tries to prolong agency. It is past time for the world community to organize against the threat the US poses to them. This is just getting started.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The US has military installations in 55 countries, I’m afraid that very soon, they’ll turn on the people they promised to “protect.” Total global shakedown. Just like the American oligarchy will have no qualms about further dismantling public infrastructure and driving wages and living conditions of their own populace down into bare survival mode if it means they can become trillionaires. Plus, poor and desperate people make good soldiers.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          This is really the most astute take I’ve read, so far.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        All great empires go through to decline, the fascinating thing about the US is that it happened so quickly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          Not really. Usually the decline starts out slowly, but once it reaches a certain point it finishes collapsing very quickly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      372 months ago

      Even if sanity is restored next election cycle, I think at this point no one will ever trust us again knowing that in 4 years there’s a huge chance all hell will break loose again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 months ago

      The US simply will not survive in its current form for another 20 or 30 years. Whether by slow, festering rot or violent implosion.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The US will be spending the next several decades building their reputation back up antagonizing the rest of the world hard for even the tiniest short-term gains of its ruling class, kowtowing only to China.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Until the next insurrectionist fascist rapist turns up. They seem to like them over, say, having to make difficult choices over there. Except that the choice wasn’t even that difficult to begin with.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      The US is never more than 4 years away from electing a lunatic. Soft power is not really a possibility anymore.

  • Drusas
    link
    fedilink
    352 months ago

    Frederiksen offered closer co-operation with the US on military bases and mineral exploitation on the island, but senior European officials said Trump baulked at the offer, demanding full US control.

    You could get everything without being a colonialist bully! FFS.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 months ago

      I was hoping it would say someone finally told Trump, “Bitch, get back in your place because no one is putting up with your shit.” Imagine my disappointment at the reasonable attempt to lower tensions and appease.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        322 months ago

        Serious politicians (and I use that term loosely) are not used to dealing with someone as utterly demented as trump on a daily basis. They’re used to long boring meetings and talking politely behind each others backs. Not … this.

        People had a hard time understanding Hitler at first, too, and he wrote a fucking book about what he was about to do before he actually went and did it.